Current as of: 2011-01-31
Date confirmed Location Animal type infected
January 19 Saskatchewan Deer
January 4 Saskatchewan Deer
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/disemala/rep/2011cwdmdce.shtml
Current as of: 2011-01-31
Date confirmed Location Animal type infected January 19 Ontario Sheep
*Atypical scrapie
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/disemala/rep/2011scrtree.shtml
Wednesday, August 11, 2010
REPORT ON THE INVESTIGATION OF THE SIXTEENTH CASE OF BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY (BSE) IN CANADA
http://bse-atypical.blogspot.com/2010/08/report-on-investigation-of-sixteenth.html
Thursday, August 19, 2010
REPORT ON THE INVESTIGATION OF THE SEVENTEENTH CASE OF BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY (BSE) IN CANADA
http://bseusa.blogspot.com/2010/08/report-on-investigation-of-seventeenth.html
Thursday, August 19, 2010 REPORT ON THE INVESTIGATION OF THE SEVENTEENTH CASE OF BOVINE SPONGIFORM ENCEPHALOPATHY (BSE) IN CANADA Greetings BSE-L et al,
I have sent off for a full report on the 17th case of BSE in Canada, and anymore cases since then. It now seems that the only way Canada is going to report their cases to the media, consumer, or the public, is if you ask, and be sure to be very explicit when you ask for whatever case you are referring too. I can't (well, I can) believe it's come to this. WE know the USA has systematically covered up mad cow disease in the USA (they just screwed up and got caught a couple of times), but this just seems to be acceptable now around the globe. But for Canada now to turn to these same type practices as the USDA, after such a long time of being up front with the consumer and the world on their Transmissible Spongiform Encephalopathy problems, I find it sad that this is what it has come to now. I had previously ask the CFIA for the ''16th case, and up'', and they only sent me the 16th case of mad cow disease. So I will await now to see if we get the full details on the 17th case of mad cow disease in Canada, and or the 18th case, and any more cases they might have found to date. I cannot believe either that this is what the OIE has let it come to be.
It says on the CFIA website ;
Completed Investigations The CFIA has completed investigations of 16 cases of BSE in Canadian cattle.
To request a copy of a BSE investigation report that is not listed below, please send an e-mail to CFIAMaster@inspection.gc.ca or call 1-800-442-2342.
http://www.inspection.gc.ca/english/anima/disemala/bseesb/comenqe.shtml
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Manitoba veterinarian has been fined $10,000 for falsifying certification documents for U.S. bound cattle and what about mad cow disease ?
http://usdameatexport.blogspot.com/2010/12/manitoba-veterinarian-has-been-fined.html
i wonder if CFIA Canada uses the same OBEX ONLY diagnostic criteria as the USDA ?
Tuesday, November 02, 2010
BSE - ATYPICAL LESION DISTRIBUTION (RBSE 92-21367) statutory (obex only) diagnostic criteria CVL 1992
http://bse-atypical.blogspot.com/2010/11/bse-atypical-lesion-distribution-rbse.html
PLEASE NOTE, I still have not received my request for the full report of the 17th case of BSE in Canada, and or if anymore cases have been reported since Canada started using the USDA's cloak and dagger secret BSE surveillance program of SSS. The SSS policy seems to now be the gold card for the OIE. I had great respect for Canada's BSE surveillance program and defended them greatly in the past. BUT, they have taken the low road of secrecy now, as with the USA. These actions speak louder than words, and proves in my opinion that they have more to hide than meats the eye i.e. mad cow disease $$$ for them to turn to secrecy as the USA, mad cow disease must really be bad. They still don't even list BSE mad cow # 16 and or BSE mad cow # 17 case on the CFIA site. i guess if these cases are not posted, the world thinks they are not happening. WRONG !
BSE, MRR, TSS and R-CALF ON CANADA VS USA
Bill Rancher
Joined: 10 Feb 2005 Posts: 1418 Location: GWN Posted: Fri Jan 05, 2007 9:49 am Post subject:
Texan wrote:
Hey Terry, I'd like to get a little further clarification on something if/when you have time. I'm not sure if I'm reading you correctly....
flounder wrote:
This is what sank my battleship in regards to testifying for r-calf. they actually appoached me about it, but i told them i would be glad to testify, but i was not stopping at the Canadian border, my testimony was to come south as well if given the opportunity. and that ended that, but i did supply them with a load of data, for whatever that was worth.
I highlighted the parts that confuse me. This almost makes it seem as if R-CALF was asking you to testify for them, but changed their mind when they found out that you were going to tell the WHOLE truth, instead of just the truth as regards Canadian imports.
I thought that R-CALF was only interested in the WHOLE truth - not just the selected parts of the truth that fit their protectionist agenda? After reading your post, it makes a person wonder. Maybe I read it wrong...
Am I reading this correctly, Terry? That can't be right, can it? Thanks.
I was wondering exactly the same thing Texan.
_________________
Canadian Beef....A cut above the rest!
my answer to big muddy from canada ;
hello there Texan,
yep, you read it right. don't know what ya'll gonna do without me. you know i plan on retiring from this mess soon. the pay is simply too excessive ;-( i fed them all i had at the time, and they shot the teacher. then hired old stanley i heard, go figure, must have been all those PhDs i had ;-)
as with the fuji-tv, when they came here and interviewed me for a BSE show, that i don't know what happened too, or the madcowboy documentary i was asked to proofread, and did, assured i would get some credit for, to never hear from again, to the speech in south Korea i was to make Nov. 23, but was
shipwrecked somehow there too, and that might have been a good thing considering all the riots, and they did get the information anyway, to the TSS documentary, that too fell apart for good reasons i suppose, to helping creekstone, and finally to the NIH attempted destruction of an historical bank of donated tissue from CJD victims, and that one i think i did manage to stop, and that thanks to a Republican John Cornyn, i simply think it's time to let you fellars and gals clear this mess up. i have wasted enough time. it will be a decade next Christmas. i just would hate to keep kicking the same old mad cow. i know what happened for the most part, and the ones that don't get it now, never will.
now there Texan, as far as your question, and confusion ;-) i bet you thought i was not going to answer it, or, maybe hoping i would ;
flounder wrote:
This is what sank my battleship in regards to testifying for r-calf. they actually appoached me about it, but i told them i would be glad to testify, but i was not stopping at the Canadian border, my testimony was to come south as well if given the opportunity. and that ended that, but i did supply them with a load of data, for whatever that was worth.
I highlighted the parts that confuse me. This almost makes it seem as if R-CALF was asking you to testify for them, but changed their mind when they found out that you were going to tell the WHOLE truth, instead of just the truth as regards Canadian imports.
I thought that R-CALF was only interested in the WHOLE truth - not just the selected parts of the truth that fit their protectionist agenda? After reading your post, it makes a person wonder. Maybe I read it wrong...
Am I reading this correctly, Terry? That can't be right, can it? Thanks.
=========================================================
hello again there Texan,
i don't guess it matters anymore, i don't think ill be testifying for anyone, unless it is my own execution.
i was willing to participate in good faith, and sound science, that is why i
think i was never sent to testify,
because in my opinion, R-Calf only wanted to cherry-pick the science, to use
to there advantage, to try and
claim that Canada had a worse BSE problem than the USA, and i could not conceed to that. the science did
not confirm this. all one has to do is read the BSE GBR risk assessments, and that is why GW/OIE et al revised
there own risk assessments ;-) the BSE MRR policy.
i don't know, maybe i misinterpreted it all, maybe not, you can be the judge
oh what tangled webs we weave, when all we do is practice to deceive. ...TSS
SNIP...END... SEE FULL TEXT, you need to read the following ;
start thread here r-calf vs TSS
*** http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15704&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=12
follow thread here ;
http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15704&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=24
http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15704&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=36
http://ranchers.net/forum/viewtopic.php?t=15704&postdays=0&postorder=asc&start=48
Saturday, April 11, 2009
CJD FOUNDATION SIDES WITH R-CALFERS NO BSE OR HUMAN TSE THERE OF IN USA 'don't be fooled'
http://prionunitusaupdate2008.blogspot.com/2009/04/cjd-foundation-sides-with-r-calfers-no.html
Sunday, April 12, 2009
r-calf and the USA mad cow problem, don't look, don't find, and then blame Canada
http://prionunitusaupdate2008.blogspot.com/2009/04/r-calf-and-usa-mad-cow-problem-dont.html
http://prionunitusaupdate2008.blogspot.com/2009/04/cjd-foundation-sides-with-r-calfers-no.html#comments
Wednesday, November 18, 2009
R-CALF: 40 Groups Disagree With USDA's Latest BSE Court Submission
http://bse-atypical.blogspot.com/2009/11/r-calf-40-groups-disagree-with-usdas.html
BSE MRR = don't look, don't find, thus keep the gold card, and BSE aka mad cow disease will continue to spread. $$$ and that's just what the OIE is all about. ...TSS
Saturday, January 29, 2011
Atypical L-Type Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy (L-BSE) Transmission to Cynomolgus Macaques, a Non-Human Primate
Jpn. J. Infect. Dis., 64 (1), 81-84, 2011
http://transmissiblespongiformencephalopathy.blogspot.com/2011/01/atypical-l-type-bovine-spongiform.html
CJD9/10022
October 1994
Mr R.N. Elmhirst Chairman British Deer Farmers Association Holly Lodge Spencers Lane BerksWell Coventry CV7 7BZ
Dear Mr Elmhirst,
CREUTZFELDT-JAKOB DISEASE (CJD) SURVEILLANCE UNIT REPORT
Thank you for your recent letter concerning the publication of the third annual report from the CJD Surveillance Unit. I am sorry that you are dissatisfied with the way in which this report was published.
The Surveillance Unit is a completely independant outside body and the Department of Health is committed to publishing their reports as soon as they become available. In the circumstances it is not the practice to circulate the report for comment since the findings of the report would not be amended. In future we can ensure that the British Deer Farmers Association receives a copy of the report in advance of publication.
The Chief Medical Officer has undertaken to keep the public fully informed of the results of any research in respect of CJD. This report was entirely the work of the unit and was produced completely independantly of the the Department.
The statistical results reqarding the consumption of venison was put into perspective in the body of the report and was not mentioned at all in the press release. Media attention regarding this report was low key but gave a realistic presentation of the statistical findings of the Unit. This approach to publication was successful in that consumption of venison was highlighted only once by the media ie. in the News at one television proqramme.
I believe that a further statement about the report, or indeed statistical links between CJD and consumption of venison, would increase, and quite possibly give damaging credence, to the whole issue. From the low key media reports of which I am aware it seems unlikely that venison consumption will suffer adversely, if at all.
http://web.archive.org/web/20030511010117/http://www.bseinquiry.gov.uk/files/yb/1994/10/00003001.pdf
UPDATED DATA ON 2ND CWD STRAIN
Wednesday, September 08, 2010
CWD PRION CONGRESS SEPTEMBER 8-11 2010
http://chronic-wasting-disease.blogspot.com/2010/09/cwd-prion-2010.html
Our findings demonstrate that cervid PrPSc, upon strain adaptation by serial passages in vitro or in cervid transgenic mice, is capable of converting human PrPC to produce PrPSc with unique biochemical properties, likely representing a new human prion strain. The newly generated CWD-huPrPSc material has been inoculated into transgenic mice expressing human PrP to study infectivity and disease phenotype and this data will be published elsewhere.
http://www.jbc.org/content/early/2011/01/04/jbc.M110.198465.long
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2011 12:15 PM
Subject: NMLB and USDA allow scrapie prion infected mutton to enter food chain on the Navajo Reservation in New Mexico
Greetings Honorable People of the Great Navajo Nation, and the Honorable President Ben Shelly,
I send this to you with great concern. ...
http://scrapie-usa.blogspot.com/2011/02/nmlb-and-usda-allow-scrapie-prion.html
Monday, February 7, 2011
FDA's Currently-Recommended Policies to Reduce the Possible Risk of Transmission of CJD and vCJD by Blood and Blood Products 2011 ???
http://tseac.blogspot.com/2011/02/fdas-currently-recommended-policies-to.html
Terry S. Singeltary Sr. P.O. Box 42 Bacliff, Texas USA 77518 flounder9@verizon.net
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)